Office of the Vice Provost for Research + Scholarship
The University of Miami encourages innovation, commercialization, and startup formation, that translate discoveries into products and services to benefit society. Federal agencies provide non-dilutive funding for startup companies through programs such as Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) to advance promising technologies. This guidance is intended to support investigators in pursuing these opportunities thoughtfully, responsibly, and successfully. SBIR and STTR programs provide equity-free, non-dilutive early-stage funding to derisk new technologies, thereby increasing the likelihood of real-world implementation. For the STTR program, the small company must subaward a portion of the scope of work to a higher education institution. University and company responsibilities and scopes of work should remain distinct. Clear separation protects intellectual property, research integrity, clarifies accountability, reduces compliance risk, and demonstrates appropriate stewardship of sponsor funds. All related interests must be disclosed and reviewed, and any identified conflicts managed in accordance with University policies. To avoid conflicts of commitment, faculty responsibilities to the University and the company must remain distinct and may not overlap. It is essential to engage Office of Technology Transfer early regarding the use of any inventions, software, data, materials, etc. in an SBIR/STTR grant proposal. Since the small company is receiving the federal funding, a licensing agreement for any University of Miami intellectual property, data, software, etc. will need to be executed prior to receipt of funds. Equity ownership, founder status, consulting arrangements, advisory roles, and other financial, obligatory, or commercial interests should be disclosed via the UDisclose System prior to proposal submission and reviewed appropriately. All interests should be updated within 30 days of any changes, especially those related to SBIR/STTR proposals. Thoughtfully evaluate sponsored research, teaching, clinical, administrative, consulting, and startup obligations before committing effort to ensure adequate capacity, avoid conflicts of commitment, and maintain appropriate separation between University and company activities. An individual should not serve as PI for both the company and the University on the same SBIR/STTR project. Independent leadership promotes transparency, accountability, and sponsor confidence. Subawards establish scope, effort, responsibilities, intellectual property provisions, and financial accountability while preserving institutional independence. Undisclosed interests, unclear intellectual property ownership, overcommitment, and late institutional reviews frequently contribute to delays. Faculty should consult the University Faculty Manual and applicable institutional policies governing consulting, conflicts, intellectual property, and entrepreneurial activities. The goal is not to create barriers to commercialization. Rather, these practices provide a proactive framework that supports responsible entrepreneurship, protects discoveries, and enables successful commercialization.Purpose
SBIR/STTR Programs
Separate University and Company Activities
University Intellectual Property
Disclose Financial Interests Early
Manage Effort and Commitments
Separate PI Roles
Use Subawards Strategically
Common Causes of Delay
Faculty Manual & Policy References
Supporting Successful Commercialization
Applicable University Resources
No. Although many SBIR/STTR applications include subawards to universities, under federal regulations, only small business concerns (SBCs) may apply for SBIR and STTR funding. STTR guidelines require the SBC to formally collaborate with a University or non-profit research institution. For SBIRs, this collaboration is optional.
Typically, this is done by conducting research at UM under a subaward from a small business that has received an SBIR or STTR award. ORA staff can assist UM PIs in completing and submitting paperwork needed to initiate the subaward application and contracting process. Plans for proposed research to be conducted at UM under an SBIR or STTR subaward from a SBC must be reviewed by appropriate department chair and academic dean (Gables and RSMAS) before subaward proposal materials are forwarded to ORA. This review is intended to ensure that the proposed work (a) has scientific merit, (b) constitutes a good use of UM research facilities, (c) will not compromise the PI’s academic responsibilities, (d) is for a unique and specific scope of work distinct from research funded by other outside entities, (e) is for work that does not overlap with the investigator’s other research responsibilities, and (f) reflects full cost recovery (direct and indirect), including the PI’s time, in the project budget. The UM Faculty Manual addresses outside professional activities specific to faculty working with outside companies as consultants. From a COI and conflict of commitment perspective, it is best for UM personnel to act either as a consultant to the SBC on grant-related activities, or as a researcher on a subaward to UM, but not both. The nature of the work performed defines whether someone can act as a consultant or as a researcher on a subaward, as defined in the Uniform Guidance.
Yes, but there are some key points to keep in mind. Faculty may not hold a full-time appointment at UM and concurrently serve as the Principal Investigator (PI) of an SBIR or STTR grant for a company. In general, the PI for the SBC should not be a UM employee. The PI for the company and the PI for the UM subaward must be separate individuals. See additional discussion below. Work performed by the SBC cannot occur in UM’s facilities.